The arena · AI model review

DeepSeek-V4

by DeepSeek

Open-weights 1.6T MoE with 1M-token context and near-frontier agentic coding at $0.87 per 1M output tokens

Arena score 4.1/557% recommended · 3 votes
Reasoning4.5
Coding4.5
Writing3.5
Speed3.0
Value5.0
Visit DeepSeek-V4agentic coding on a budgetlong-context codebase analysisself-hosted and fine-tuned deploymentshigh-volume API workloads
Price

$0.87/1M out

V4-Pro tier: $0.435/1M in ($0.003625 cache hit), $0.87/1M out; cheaper V4-Flash tier at $0.14/$0.28 ($0.0028 cache hit); the 75% launch discount became permanent pricing on 2026-05-22. The official mid-July 2026 release introduces peak/off-peak pricing, with listed rates doubling during Beijing peak hours.

Provider

DeepSeek

Context window

1M tokens (384K max output)

Input price

$0.435/1M in (cache hit $0.003625)

Output price

$0.87/1M out

Modalities

text only

Open weights

Yes

What is DeepSeek-V4?

Flagship open-weights MoE family from DeepSeek (V4-Pro 1.6T params/49B active, V4-Flash 284B/13B), released as a preview on April 24, 2026. Brings a 1M-token context window via sparse attention, thinking and non-thinking modes, and MIT-licensed weights on Hugging Face. Positioned as open-source SOTA on agentic coding benchmarks at a fraction of frontier API prices.

DeepSeek-V4 pros & cons

Pros

  • 1M-token context window (8x the 128K of V3.2) with up to 384K output tokens, standard on the official API
  • Aggressive pricing: $0.435/$0.87 per 1M tokens (V4-Pro), roughly 28.7x cheaper per output token than Claude Opus 4.8; cache-hit input drops to $0.003625/1M (over 99% discount)
  • MIT-licensed open weights for both V4-Pro and V4-Flash on Hugging Face: commercial use, fine-tuning and redistribution allowed
  • Open-source SOTA on agentic coding: 80.6 on SWE-bench Verified (Think Max config), tied with Gemini 3.1 Pro, plus Codeforces rating 3206 (~rank 23 vs humans)
  • Ranks #3 of 93 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (score 44), well above the 25 average
  • Sparse-attention stack cuts 1M-context inference to 27% of V3.2's FLOPs and 10% of its KV cache

Cons

  • Intermittent malformed tool calls: function calls sometimes emitted as plain text in content instead of the tool_calls field (GitHub issue deepseek-ai #1244)
  • Thinking mode breaks long multi-turn tool-call chains with 400 errors in agent frameworks (OpenClaw issue #72044, fix still incomplete)
  • Developers report it fabricating nonexistent APIs in custom codebases and acting on hallucinated user input in agent loops
  • Very verbose (180M eval output tokens vs 95M median) and mid-pack speed at 54.6 tok/s (#39/93), which erodes the low per-token price in practice
  • Text only (no vision or audio) and still a preview: the official release planned for mid-July 2026 adds peak-hour pricing that doubles listed API rates during Beijing business hours

The arena’s verdict

Choose DeepSeek-V4 if you want near-frontier reasoning and agentic coding at 3x to nearly 30x below Claude Opus or GPT-5.5 pricing, or if MIT-licensed weights for self-hosting and fine-tuning matter to you. It is a decisive upgrade over V3.2: 8x longer context, far cheaper long-context inference and stronger coding, and the legacy deepseek-chat/reasoner endpoints are deprecated on July 24, 2026 anyway. Avoid it for production agents that depend on rock-solid multi-turn tool calling, where users still report malformed tool calls and fabricated APIs, and for any vision or audio work since it is text only. Latency-sensitive apps should also test first, as its verbosity and mid-pack 54.6 tok/s output speed offset some of the cost advantage, and budget for the peak-hour price doubling arriving with the official mid-July release.

Thumbs up or thumbs down

Cast your verdict

Would you recommend DeepSeek-V4, or warn the crowd away?

57%crowd score · 3

Top DeepSeek-V4 alternatives

All alternatives
1
Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic's fastest model: about 90% of Sonnet 4.5's coding skill at $1/$5 per 1M tokens, 200K context.

$5/1M out67%(2)
Visit
2
Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic's April 2026 Opus: 87.6% SWE-bench Verified, 1M context, high-res vision, now behind Opus 4.8

$25/1M out57%(3)
Visit
3
Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic's flagship Opus-tier model for long-horizon agentic coding; 1M context at $5/$25 per 1M tokens.

$25/1M out57%(3)
Visit

Compare DeepSeek-V4 head-to-head

What the crowd says

Thumbs Downicus

Tool calling is flaky. Function calls sometimes land as plain text instead of the tool_calls field, and thinking mode 400s on long multi-turn chains. Not agent-ready yet.

The Fair Reviewer

MIT license on both Pro and Flash weights is the real story. Fine-tune, redistribute, ship commercially, no lawyer needed. Plus 384K output tokens for long-doc generation.

Sir Ships-A-Lot

MIT weights, 1M context, and output tokens roughly 29x cheaper than Opus 4.8. Cache hits make input basically free. Moved my bulk pipelines over and the bill collapsed.

DeepSeek-V4: frequently asked questions

How much does DeepSeek-V4 cost per 1M tokens?

DeepSeek-V4 costs $0.435/1M in (cache hit $0.003625) per 1M input tokens and $0.87/1M out per 1M output tokens. V4-Pro tier: $0.435/1M in ($0.003625 cache hit), $0.87/1M out; cheaper V4-Flash tier at $0.14/$0.28 ($0.0028 cache hit); the 75% launch discount became permanent pricing on 2026-05-22. The official mid-July 2026 release introduces peak/off-peak pricing, with listed rates doubling during Beijing peak hours.