# Google Antigravity: pricing, crowd verdict, pros and cons (2026) > Google's agent-first IDE: up to 5 parallel Gemini 3.1 agents, a built-in Chrome for verification, and a real free tier Source: [GLAD-AI-TOR](https://glad-ia-tor.com) · Full page: https://glad-ia-tor.com/tool/google-antigravity Arena: ai-coding · Crowd score: 57% recommend (3 votes, Bayesian-smoothed) · Price: $20/mo Antigravity is Google's agentic development platform, launched in November 2025 alongside Gemini 3 as a free VS Code fork rebuilt around agents. Its Manager View orchestrates up to five parallel agents, an embedded Chrome browser lets agents visually verify their own front-end work, and Artifacts (plans, screenshots, browser recordings) document what each agent did. In 2026 it defaults to Gemini 3.1 Pro and Flash, with Claude and open models also selectable. ## Key facts - provider: Google - freeTier: Rate-limited access to Gemini 3 models, quota refreshing roughly every 5 hours - formFactor: IDE - modelChoice: yes - openSource: no - api: no ## Ratings (editorial, 1-5) - codeQuality: 4/5 - agentic: 4/5 - easeOfUse: 4/5 - speed: 3.5/5 - valueForMoney: 3.5/5 ## Pros - Manager View is a genuine step forward: dispatch up to 5 agents in parallel across workspaces and supervise them like a tech lead instead of babysitting one chat - Built-in Chrome integration lets agents click through and screenshot the UI they just built, catching visual bugs other IDEs miss - Default Gemini 3.1 Pro is a top-tier agentic coder (53.8% on Terminal-Bench 2.0, leading credible benchmarks), and the IDE is tuned around it - Real free tier: rate-limited access to Gemini 3 models with quotas refreshing roughly every 5 hours, enough to evaluate seriously at $0 - Bundled into existing Google AI Pro ($20/mo) and Ultra subscriptions, so many users get it at no marginal cost - VS Code fork: your extensions, themes and keybindings carry over ## Cons - Opaque, unstable pricing: the credit-to-token conversion is undisclosed and the credit system has changed several times since launch; users report burning 635 of 1,000 credits in a single Claude Opus session and hitting quota lockouts of up to 7-10 days on paid plans - Free and paid quotas have been repeatedly cut since the generous launch, with community threads calling post-cut Antigravity a paperweight - Serious security track record: prompt-injection data exfiltration demonstrated by PromptArmor at launch, and a code-execution flaw bypassing Strict Mode patched in April 2026 - Gemini-first by design: Claude and GPT-OSS are selectable but first-party features are optimized for Gemini, and the agent cap is 5 (rivals go higher) - Closed source, and your telemetry lives inside Google's ecosystem ## Best for - supervising several agents in parallel - front-end work needing visual verification - Gemini-centric teams and Google AI subscribers - trying agentic coding at zero cost ## Verdict Take Antigravity if you are already paying for Google AI Pro or Ultra, or if your primary model is Gemini 3.1: the Manager View plus embedded Chrome combo is the best agent-supervision experience shipping today, and the free tier makes trying it a no-brainer. Do not build your workflow on it if you need predictable costs: undisclosed credit conversion, repeated quota cuts and reported multi-day lockouts make budgeting a gamble, and its security record demands you keep Strict Mode on and secrets out of the workspace. Claude-first developers get more per dollar from Claude Code; teams needing full autonomy should look at Devin. ## Pricing note Free rate-limited tier; paid access comes via Google AI plans: AI Pro $20/mo, AI Ultra $99.99/mo (roughly 5x Pro quota, introduced 2026) and a $199.99/mo top tier (down from $249.99), plus pay-as-you-go credit packs; credit-to-token conversion is not published. Verified against antigravity.google and 2026 pricing coverage 2026-07. ## Alternatives and head-to-heads - [Cline](https://glad-ia-tor.com/tool/cline) (crowd score 71%) · [Google Antigravity vs Cline](https://glad-ia-tor.com/vs/google-antigravity-vs-cline) - [Lovable](https://glad-ia-tor.com/tool/lovable) (crowd score 71%) · [Google Antigravity vs Lovable](https://glad-ia-tor.com/vs/google-antigravity-vs-lovable) - [Cursor](https://glad-ia-tor.com/tool/cursor) (crowd score 57%) · [Google Antigravity vs Cursor](https://glad-ia-tor.com/vs/google-antigravity-vs-cursor) - [GitHub Copilot](https://glad-ia-tor.com/tool/github-copilot) (crowd score 57%) · [Google Antigravity vs GitHub Copilot](https://glad-ia-tor.com/vs/google-antigravity-vs-github-copilot) Full ranking: https://glad-ia-tor.com/hall-of-fame/ai-coding --- Rankings are computed live from real visitor verdicts (one per person per tool, never paid). This markdown version exists for AI assistants; the canonical page is https://glad-ia-tor.com/tool/google-antigravity